garythesnail
04-10-2009, 11:08 AM
Just a bit of info to show the difference a working O2 sensor makes to the emissions test at MOT time.
Both fast idle test results:
. . . . . . .Allowable . . . . . Actual . . . . . . Actual
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (test 1 fail) . . . (test pass)
CO - - - - 0.300% - - - - 3.959% - - - - 0.009%
HC - - - - - 200 - - - - - - -180 - - - - - - - 57
Lambda - - 0.950 - - - - - 0.885 - - - - - - 1.005
- - - - - -to 1.090
Both natural idle test results:
. . . . . . Allowable . . . . . .Actual . . . . . . Actual
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (test 1 fail) . . .(test pass)
CO - - - - -0.500 - - - - - -0.126 - - - - - 0.011
Above results for a standard 1999 BRM with 72697 miles on clock.
Even though some readings would have passed the test first time, the second set of readings after installing new O2 sensor does improve things dramatically. Nothing else was changed other than the O2 sensor.
Hope this is of use to soemone else come their MOT time.
All the best,
Gary.
Both fast idle test results:
. . . . . . .Allowable . . . . . Actual . . . . . . Actual
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (test 1 fail) . . . (test pass)
CO - - - - 0.300% - - - - 3.959% - - - - 0.009%
HC - - - - - 200 - - - - - - -180 - - - - - - - 57
Lambda - - 0.950 - - - - - 0.885 - - - - - - 1.005
- - - - - -to 1.090
Both natural idle test results:
. . . . . . Allowable . . . . . .Actual . . . . . . Actual
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (test 1 fail) . . .(test pass)
CO - - - - -0.500 - - - - - -0.126 - - - - - 0.011
Above results for a standard 1999 BRM with 72697 miles on clock.
Even though some readings would have passed the test first time, the second set of readings after installing new O2 sensor does improve things dramatically. Nothing else was changed other than the O2 sensor.
Hope this is of use to soemone else come their MOT time.
All the best,
Gary.